The Kyoto Treaty Versus the Space Twat of Ecstasy

jap_dem_ousted.jpg

(This man is not ecstatic because he’s been informed that he’s not going to get any Space Twat - because his wife doesn’t want him bringing any cooties home.)

I read this over at Power Line:

The Kyoto treaty was agreed upon in late 1997 and countries started signing and ratifying it in 1998. A list of countries and their carbon dioxide emissions due to consumption of fossil fuels is available from the U.S. government. If we look at that data and compare 2004 (latest year for which data is available) to 1997 (last year before the Kyoto treaty was signed), we find the following.

* Emissions worldwide increased 18.0%.
* Emissions from countries that signed the treaty increased 21.1%.
* Emissions from non-signers increased 10.0%.
* Emissions from the U.S. increased 6.6%.

Now, considering that the US produces a huge percentage of the worlds manufactured goods, and an even huger percentage of the worlds food - I have to say the real question is “Why does the US put up with the rest of the worlds obscene levels of pollution, sloth and inefficiency?”

I’ll tell you why we put up with it:

Euro-Babes and high quality nooky porn. Its that simple. Just look:

3d.jpg

Notice the Euro styling and curves.

3e.jpg

Naturally, your mileage may vary.

3f.jpg

This model stripped on a closed road with professional clothing, and with a dentist present.

Don’t try this at home. Oh - go ahead if it means that much to you.

10 Responses to “The Kyoto Treaty Versus the Space Twat of Ecstasy”

  1. Reg Says:

    Tell me the name of the stunning woman in the top two pics so I can get a sfw pic of her for Mitchieville!

  2. Steamboat McGoo Says:

    I can’t Reg - I don’t know it. When I copy porn I just put it in a file along with the rest and rename it to 2a,b,c etc or 3a,b,c etc. She was just 3d and 3e.

    I’ll try to retrace my steps for you - but - Christ! - there are a bunch of sites out there! And they’re all interlinked and mixed up.

    Lets see what I can do. I’m running low anyway.

  3. Steamboat McGoo Says:

    Reg - I just searched for her - no joy so far, but don’t despair yet.

    One - I have made a li’l avatar up in the corner of my PC screen that I can click on any time to pull her image up. When I am smut-huntin’ I’ll have it up so if I see her I’ll recognise her.

    Two - I am revising my saving/naming procedure so names are preserved. That way this will not happen again.

    Three - Like I said - don’t despair. I run into the same (noticable) photos fairly often as I wade through the (endless) porn photo montages looking for smut with a little class.

    You may not get the name for a while - but I bet I’ll eventually get it. I think she was either Playboy, Penthouse, or Twisty’s. But I just can’t be sure.

  4. Gnus Says:

    McGoo, tellin’ me to “look” at Euro babes and nooky porn is sorta superflous. You post ‘em, I’m looking. [note: insert big smiley emoticon here]

    What? Got some reticent readers?

  5. Biseor Says:

    Do you know of any good space-twat outlets?

  6. Steamboat McGoo Says:

    No - but the local Denny’s used to have some spaced-out twats. But they’ve all flown south for the winter or something.

    Don’t you hate it when that happens, Biseor?

  7. Gibby Haynes Says:

    But those boobies are surgically enhanced. I mean she’s stunning facially, and her semi-obscured catcher’s mitt looks clean and disease-free, and I know people as physically repugnant as myself can’t afford to be picky, but those norks will look exactly the same as that when she’s a few seconds away from old-age-caused death, whereas the rest of her body will’ve aged accordingly.
    I hate to be a party-pooper but I’d have a difficult time flinging any dripping over (not literally; I’m not a barbarian) those photomagraphs.
    The second girl I’d crawl over spent nuclear fuel to get close to.
    Oh, and you warmongering, fascist, babykilling, trailerpark-residing Americans increased your carbon output by 6.6%? For shame! Don’t you know that only American-made carbon is bad? Tut-tut.

  8. Steamboat McGoo Says:

    Gibby! Welcome!

    Seriously? Truth be told - I love beauty, so I accept and appreciate artifice. The philosophy may be crude and simplistic - but its all I have.

    I hear you as to the second lady. I’m not that picky - and would probably pre-explode if either one even hinted that she’s be willing.

    Also - if what I’ve read is generally true, neither one would be willing - with anyone - except after paying a hell of a fee.

    Isn’t the ongoing implosion of the horseshit AGW/carbon credit/creeping socialism great! I love it.

    Update: BTW - the first lady is the only one I’ve had inquiries about. Took me a while to find where I downloaded her from.

    Didi you know that 12% of all web sites are porn? Check out:

    http://www.mitchieville.blogspot.com/

    - about 2-3 articles down.

  9. Gibby Haynes Says:

    Thanks, nice place you’ve got here.
    ‘Yeah, nice place. It would be an awful shame if it were to get…smashed up. *Deliberately knocks porcelain ballerina onto the floor, smashing it* Oops, how clumsy of me…
    Eh…anyway, I stopped by the other day, but I say Feynman diagrams and got scared and ran away and hide behind the e-sofa.
    The more I think about that girl’s augmentificated boobs, the more I think it’s some sort of goddamned tragedy.

  10. Steamboat McGoo Says:

    Those Feynman diagrams are just to keep the spam away. It works. Try ‘em! Bernoulli equations work too, but only in the Spring.

    Uh-oh. They old “Python Protection Racket”, eh?

    (Note: What kind of spell checker would have Bernoulli in it but not asshat?

Leave a Reply