New York Bedbugs & DNC Sanitary Habits
The above photo was labeled “University of Florida” but I know for fact that it is actually a fairly accurate depiction of a bedbug.
Besides, the University of Florida is way bigger, and does not have legs.
Here’s another photo - of a bedbug this time - just to prove my hypothesis:
There’s an article about New York bedbugs somewhere on the Net - but I can’t tell you where it is because I lost the link.
If I find it, I’ll call.
Oh. Here it is. Woot.
They say New York is infested with the little critters and they’ll probably have to amputate the entire state. Under consideration is the possibility of using Ted Kennedy’s underwear as a tourniquet during the operation.
How long has Hillary been a Senator in New York? And how long have they been getting this bedbug problem they claim is a euro-trash problem?
Here’s some porn to get you to thinking about bedbugs and Ted’s underwear:
Her name is I-Don’t-Know Lux Kassidy (thanks to Durp!). I didn’t notice how really hot she is until I built this post and was reviewing the photos. Damn.
And:
And:
And:
And finally:
Tags: bedbugs, buggary, DNC halitosis, toe-dirt, treptomycin, underwear
January 1, 2008 at 8:31 pm
Two questions: (1) Are they real? and (2) Who cares?
January 1, 2008 at 8:56 pm
I prefer to think they’re real.
And - no - I don’t care.
Real or Memorex - either way - they be beautious.
January 2, 2008 at 12:31 am
It’s time to start using DDT again. If we don’t it’s only a matter of time before we start seeing cases of malaria which will herald our devolution back to second world status.
Or we can look at nekkid chicks and speculate on their boob’s possible augmentificationalism.
They ARE fake btw.
January 2, 2008 at 5:06 am
Oh, yes, we need to be using DDT - perhaps a tad more carefully than in previous centuries, though. But I’m not even sure of that - I distrust the research (or at least the reporting of such) so much.
I’ll keep saying it: we get most of our science news from mediocre-at-best high school students who managed to graduate and then go to journalism school, where they learned to write complete sentences and not use “ain’t” and not a whole lot more.
Now do you trust someone like that to interpret and present scientific results for you in an ACCURATE and UNBIASED fashion?
January 2, 2008 at 5:08 am
Oh - how can you tell with so much confidence that those boobs are fake, Enas? Not challenging you, you understand, just curious.
There’s so little meat there anyway I figures they had to be the real thing.
January 2, 2008 at 8:38 pm
It looks to me like the curve of her boobs are a bit off, and the nipple regions are a bit high. Hmm. Now that I look again it’s the right one that looks a little odd, but the left one looks fine. Hell, maybe they real just a little mismatched. Doesn’t really matter I suppose - she’s a stunner for sure.
January 2, 2008 at 9:01 pm
I can’t tell with boobs that small.
That’s the thing that convinces me they’re real: what woman willing to go through the boobifactorial process would stop with those itty bitty things? They ain’t hardly a mouthful. “ain’t bigger nor a derringer,”* Seems to me she’d go for the gusto…
* Name that quote and win massive respect.
March 21, 2008 at 2:42 am
Her name is Lux Kassidy.
March 21, 2008 at 6:28 am
Thanks, Durp! Post is corrected!
May 9, 2008 at 1:12 am
Any more than a mouthful is wasted.