Journalistic Bullshit In Science Reporting - And DNC Prevarication
June 19, 2008 by Steamboat McGooA while back I mentioned my ongoing irritation with journalists in general, and “science” journalists in particular, for their ignorance and dishonesty in writing and reporting. Here is an example from Science Daily:
The headline says
Thinking Ahead: Bacteria Anticipate Coming Changes In Their Environment
Now so far as I am aware, bacteria don’t “think”. They don’t have a brain of any significance, and certainly don’t have a cerebrum or higher functions in there.
The article further says (my emphasis throughout):
“Microbes may be smarter than we think. A new study by Princeton University researchers shows for the first time that bacteria don’t just react to changes in their surroundings — they anticipate and prepare for them. The findings, reported in the June 6 issue of Science, challenge the prevailing notion that only organisms with complex nervous systems have this ability.”
Now if you read further you’ll find that the bacteria are NOT “anticipating and preparing”; their genes are simply switching on and off due to external stimuli - in a manner no different from - say - our breathing rate changing with the variation in oxygen level. There is no thinking, and there is no anticipation. Just a dumb, mindless autopilot. Do you understand that this is not thinking?
It may seem innocent, but inaccurate and self-serving phrasing like this article’s text does no one any good: it simply dresses up an otherwise mundane science result unnecessarily . And it gives people a false and misleading impression of bacteria capabilities.
You add up enough of these journalistic faux displays and you end up with mis-informed - and manipulated - people.
End of lecture: here is some porn, and the Daily Yabbadabbadoo from Last Of The Few.
Oh! Here is a crop circle - very nicely done. The folks who did it encoded the first ten digits of Pi into the pattern. Neat.
I forgot where I found it, though.






























